Did Michelle Obama really quote Saul Alinsky?
Gateway Pundit examines elements of Michelle Obama’s speech:
“Barack stood up that day,” talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, “and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be…”
And, “All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do – that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”
Here’s an excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals:
“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means… The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.“
However, despite the connections between Barack Obama and Saul Alinsky’s philosophy, it is clear in this context that the ostensible intention behind Michelle’s use of this terminology is the inverse of Alinsky’s.
References

























December 28th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
There are two things about this that I don’t get.
First, what is the big objection to wanting to bring about “the world as it should be”? I can see how one might disagree with a particular individual’s version of this, but isn’t this what all political leaders have striven for, Reagan prominent among them?
Second, what do you mean when you say “it is clear in this context that the ostensible intention behind Michelle’s use of this terminology is the inverse of Alinsky’s”?