There seems to be a serious case of IraqNewsPhobia on the part of the MSM regarding the recent release of Iraqi documents. They are adding disclaimers to their coverage of these documents so overly cautious that it seems they want the import of its content to die the death of a thousand qualifiers. This obviously conveys to their readers and viewers that they should take the information contained in the documents with a pound of saltIt’s too bad they weren’t as overly zealous in their caution regarding the forged Killian documents. Of course it is a frightening prospect for many of them that the Saddam regime might be proven to have had WMDs, close ties with Bin Laden or, worse yet, involvement in Al Qeada’s terrorist attacks against the U.S. Anything that comes close to that is news that potentially vindicates the Iraq war and the Bush administration. That’s the substance of their fear or, what might be better described as a phobia.
pho·bi·a (f
b
-
)n.
1. A persistent, abnormal, or irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid the feared stimulus.
2. A strong fear, dislike, or aversion.
Such an aversion is irrational indeed given the ample evidence thus far that already gives credence to these recent documents.Over at the FreeRepublic, ravingnutter does such a thorough job at chronicling this fact that I thought I would include the full account here:
In in 1998, an Arab intelligence officer, who knows Saddam
personally, predicted in Newsweek: “Very soon you will be witnessing
large-scale terrorist activity run by the Iraqis.” The Arab official
said these terror operations would be run under “false flags”
–spook-speak for front groups–including bin Laden’s organization.
Then there were the predictions by an Iraqi with ties to Iraqi
intelligence, Naeem Abd Mulhalhal, in Qusay’s own newspaper several
weeks before the attacks that stated bin Laden would “demolish the
Pentagon after he destroys the White House and ”bin Laden would strike
America “on the arm that is already hurting.” (referencing a second
IRAQI sponsored attack on the World Trade Center). Another reference to
New York was “[bin Laden] will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra
everytime he hears his songs.” (e.g., “New York, New York”) which
identified New York, New York as a target. Mulhalhal also stated, “The
wings of a dove and the bullet are all but one and the same in the
heart of a believer.” which references an airplane attack.
The
Arabic language daily newspaper Al-Quds Al-Arabic also cited the
cooperation between Iraq, bin Laden and Al December 1998 editorial,
which predicted that “President Saddam Hussein, whose country was
subjected to a four day air strike, will look for support in taking
revenge on the United States and Britain by cooperating with Saudi
oppositionist Osama Bin-Laden, whom the United States considers to be
the most wanted person in the world.” This info is in the link provided
below. How could these people have had foreknowledge without Iraq being
involved?
Source for this info
Warning…slow loading .pdf file. This was from a lawsuit filed against Iraq after 9/11…the court ruled against Iraq.
There was also another lawsuit filed by the family of John O’Neill (a
former FBI agent who